推文

@InGodWeBelieveU · 2026-10-14 06:41

Two diets, matched on the plate for calories, sugar, sodium, fiber and macros. On one of them, people ate 𝟓𝟎𝟖 more calories a day. ▌NIH inpatient randomized crossover
𝟮𝟬 adults, 𝟮 weeks on each diet, free to eat as much or as little as they wanted. Ultra-processed vs unprocessed. Extra daily intake on the ultra-processed diet (each ▮ ≈ 50 kcal)
Total ｜▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮ +𝟱𝟬𝟴 kcal
Carbs ｜▮▮▮▮▮▮ +𝟮𝟴𝟬 kcal
Fat ｜▮▮▮▮▮ +𝟮𝟯𝟬 kcal
Protein ｜▱ −𝟮 kcal (no real difference) Body weight after 2 weeks
Ultra-processed ｜ +𝟬.𝟵 kg
Unprocessed ｜ −𝟬.𝟵 kg Weight change tracked energy intake closely (r = 𝟬.𝟴). ▌Read it like a scientist
↳ Everyone ate both diets, so each person was their own control. That's a strong design.
↳ But it's only 𝟮𝟬 people and 𝟰 weeks, on a hospital ward. Not real life.
↳ It shows the diets differed in how much people ate. It can't tell you which feature of the food drove it. I'm not a clinician. This is a research read, not diet advice. In cancer research, we'd call this a clean signal from a small study: worth replicating, not worth over-selling. What's the one ultra-processed food you'd find hardest to swap out for two weeks? Follow @InGodWeBelieveU for plain-English reads of nutrition and health trials, with the paper named in every post so you can check it yourself. #Nutrition #UltraProcessedFood #ClinicalTrials #Health

曝光 118 · 评论 1 · 点赞 1 · 书签 0 · 曝光/时 56.7253628303741