A persistent dispute has circulated across the community: "Pi earned via mobil… · @tnmse282 · TwKit

@tnmse282

A persistent dispute has circulated across the community: "Pi earned via mobile mining carries a distinct provenance compared to Pi traded on exchanges." A Web3 developer put this "mined vs. bought" narrative to the test. Referencing official Pi (Stellar-based) specifications, they developed a zero-dependency, read-only Node.js script proving that "unit provenance" simply does not exist on-chain! 💡 The Architectural Reality: 1️⃣ The Account/Balance Model (Not UTXO): Unlike Bitcoin's UTXO design, Pi operates on an account-balance model (akin to traditional bank accounts). Once tokens from different pathways enter a single wallet, their past origins instantly vanish. The ledger records a solitary scalar value—meaning no individual "coin histories" exist to differentiate self-mined tokens from acquired ones. 2️⃣ Unlabeled Native Asset: As the primary native asset of the chain, Pi operates without an asset_issuer or wrapper contract. The protocol architecture literally lacks a data field to store where an individual unit originated. 3️⃣ Layer-Wide Parity: Whether inspecting the Horizon API, Pi Wallet SDK, Platform API (PaymentDTO), or Soroban smart contract interfaces, only scalar parameters like "amount," "balance," and "limits" exist. The Definitive Finding: "Native Pi payments on the Pi mainnet ledger have zero observable mining provenance." Every single native Pi token is 100% fungible at the core protocol layer. (Disclaimer: This technical verification reflects the immutable cryptographic fungibility of the ledger itself; it does not audit or guarantee the off-chain reserves of third-party exchange platforms.) Run the zero-dependency, read-only Node 18+ script below to verify the ledger state directly! 👇 #PiNetwork #BlockchainTechnology #StellarProtocol #OnChainAnalysis #Web3Development #CryptoSpecs #Fungibility #PiPioneers #LedgerFacts #TechnicalInsights

曝光 93 · 评论 2 · 点赞 1 · 书签 0