🔥 If you vote blue, this is what will happen.👇 Oh my God! Now people even have… · @helen_maga99 · TwKit

@helen_maga99

🔥 If you vote blue, this is what will happen.👇 Oh my God! Now people even have to borrow money just to pay into the pension system. Two recent stories have been circulating online and left many people shaking their heads. The first comes from Pingshan County in Yibin, Sichuan. In April 2025, the local rural commercial bank issued the county’s first “social security credit loan.” A 60-year-old villager named Zou, whose family was struggling financially, had been unable to pay the back contributions for his pension insurance. The bank gave him a loan of 82,300 yuan, and he used it on the spot to make up the payments. Local officials promoted the move as solving his “urgent problem,” saying he would start receiving a monthly pension the following month. The second is an older story from Lianzhou in Guangdong. In 2012, 93-year-old Lü Jiaxiu made a one-time back payment of more than 40,000 yuan covering 15 years of social security. After that, she began receiving 752 yuan a month in pension benefits. At the time, she even said it was higher than her previous wages. When people put these two cases side by side, many find them hard to accept. The practical problem is clear: a 60-year-old borrows over 80,000 yuan to pay into the pension system, but how much will he actually receive each month? According to official estimates, around 800-plus yuan. Yet the loan still has to be repaid. The term can be as long as five years. Even with a relatively low interest rate, the monthly repayment burden is not small. Most of the pension he just started receiving may go straight toward loan payments. If his health declines and he doesn’t collect for many years, or if repayment becomes a problem, the elderly person not only fails to gain security but ends up carrying debt. In the case of the 93-year-old who paid more than 40,000 yuan, many people at the time questioned whether she could live long enough to break even. Later reports said she had lived to 102 and more than recovered her money, but that is an extremely rare and fortunate outcome. For the vast majority of ordinary people, this is not an “investment”—it is betting on an uncertain future. What’s more unsettling is that products like “loans for social security,” “pension loans,” and “insurance-support loans” are not isolated cases. Similar products have appeared in Hunan, Hubei, Qingdao, and elsewhere, specifically targeting people who struggle to pay contributions and are approaching retirement without enough money to make up the shortfall. Banks issue the loans, human resources and social security departments cooperate, and the money goes directly into social security accounts. On the surface, it helps disadvantaged people achieve “old-age security.” In reality, it shifts the risk from the pension fund and local governments onto the most vulnerable rural elderly. A pension system is supposed to give people peace of mind, not force them to take on debt first and then gamble on living long enough to break even. When a place starts encouraging 60-year-olds—or even older people—to borrow money just to pay into the system, it shows more than individual hardship. It shows that the pressure on the entire system has grown so great that authorities are using this method to inflate contribution bases and fund balances. They can still cut the leeks and squeeze the juice. Now they’re even boiling the dried leeks for oil. Is this kind of “innovation” really protecting the elderly, or is it pushing them into an even deeper hole?

曝光 70 · 评论 0 · 点赞 0 · 书签 0