I Strongly Oppose the Tesla–SpaceX Merger (2/13) @elonmusk @Gwynne_Shotwell Wh… · @mylifeonmystyle · TwKit

@mylifeonmystyle

I Strongly Oppose the Tesla–SpaceX Merger (2/13) @elonmusk @Gwynne_Shotwell Why Merge Two Companies That Can Already Work Together? Elon Musk argues that combining Tesla and SpaceX could unlock enormous synergies in AI, robotics, chips, and space infrastructure. He’s right about the opportunities. But identifying synergies is not the same as making a business case for a merger. Here’s why. ① The Synergies Already Exist Tesla develops autonomous driving, robotics, batteries, energy storage, and AI chips. SpaceX operates launch systems, satellite networks, and increasingly ambitious AI infrastructure. Their capabilities are complementary. But the companies are already collaborating. Terafab is a perfect example. Tesla and SpaceX can jointly develop semiconductor manufacturing capabilities without merging their entire businesses. If cooperation is already possible, what additional value requires a merger? ② Contracts Can Capture Value Without Combining Risks Suppose SpaceX needs thousands of Tesla Megapacks, Optimus robots, or custom AI chips. Tesla can sell them. SpaceX gets the technology. Tesla earns revenue and potentially profits. For deeper integration, they could establish joint ventures, share development costs, or negotiate long-term supply agreements. Why combine two multitrillion-dollar businesses when targeted partnerships may deliver the same benefits? A merger should be the last resort, not the default solution. ③ Combining Businesses Also Combines Problems Tesla faces automotive competition, autonomous-driving regulation, and manufacturing challenges. SpaceX operates in a different world: defense contracts, launch regulation, satellite communications, and orbital infrastructure. A merger would connect these risks. It could also create significant regulatory complications. Tesla depends heavily on Chinese manufacturing, while SpaceX handles sensitive U.S. defense and aerospace programs. That combination invites scrutiny from both Washington and Beijing. For what measurable financial benefit? ④ A Merger Doesn’t Create Technology Combining the companies won’t automatically produce another Starship, Cybercab, Optimus, or breakthrough AI chip. Innovation comes from engineering, execution, and disciplined capital allocation—not corporate restructuring. Yes, full integration might eliminate certain organizational barriers. But those benefits must be quantified against integration costs, regulatory risks, and lost strategic flexibility. ⑤ The Burden of Proof Before shareholders approve a merger, management should answer one question: What economic value can Tesla and SpaceX create together that they cannot create separately? Not theoretical synergies. Not a bigger corporate empire. Measurable, incremental shareholder value. Until that case is demonstrated, I believe Tesla and SpaceX should remain independent. Great companies don’t need to become one company to achieve great things together. Next (3/13): Two Growth Curves—Could SpaceX Slow Tesla Down? @mylifeonmystyle #Tesla #SpaceX #TSLA

曝光 300 · 评论 1 · 点赞 3 · 书签 0