I agree with the principle, but I think we're confusing ownership of intellige… · @noahatwhere · TwKit

@noahatwhere

I agree with the principle, but I think we're confusing ownership of intelligence with ownership of infrastructure. You don't need to own the model weights to own your AI workflow. What actually matters is whether your data is portable, your agents are model-agnostic, and your tools, memory, and execution environment can survive switching providers. Running a weaker model locally just for the sake of independence isn't necessarily empowering. Sometimes it's simply paying more for less intelligence. And open weights don't automatically give you control over the entire stack either. I think the future is probably hybrid: local models where privacy, latency, and cost justify them; frontier APIs where capability matters most. The real goal isn't to eliminate dependencies. It's to make dependencies replaceable. Own the system. Rent the intelligence when it makes sense. Never let a single provider own your workflow.

曝光 117 · 评论 1 · 点赞 1 · 书签 0